Aggregator
Dakota Johnson dons sheer lace dress and peekaboo lingerie at ‘Verity’ London premiere
The ABA Shouldn't Get To Grade Its Own Homework
Authored by Bryan Cutsinger via RealClearEducation,
The organization tasked with accrediting the nation's law schools will appear before a federal advisory panel later this month to defend its government-recognized status as an accreditor. This status gives the Council of the American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar the power to determine which schools have access to federal student aid and, in most states, whether graduates may sit for the bar. In short, federal recognition gives the council extraordinary power over entry into the legal profession.
Last month, the Department of Education identified numerous compliance failures by the council and recommended ending that recognition. Among the Department's findings was that the council is not sufficiently "separate and independent" from the ABA - a charge that is far from surprising.
The council is not separately incorporated from the ABA. Nor do the two organizations possess a distinct employer identification number, or file separate tax returns. Moreover, the ABA has the authority to amend the council's bylaws, giving the profession's principle membership organization authority over the accreditor's governing framework. The council does have procedures in place to insulate individual accreditation decisions from ABA politics. But these internal checks are unlikely to be effective if the two entities are one in the same.
The problem extends far beyond the legal profession. In a forthcoming study in the European Economic Review, I examined whether there was similarly structural entanglement between all 25 federally recognized professional accreditors and their corresponding professional or membership associations. I found that 22 share an employer identification number, consolidated tax filing, or single legal identity.
My findings don't prove that every accreditation decision is improper. They do, however, identify a potential conflict of interest that can lead to worse outcomes for students and consumers alike. Incumbent professionals benefit when entry into their profession is limited - fewer lawyers means higher salaries. Students and consumers, by contrast, benefit from affordable, innovative routes into a profession.
To be sure, accreditation standards can play an important role in protecting quality. But they can also suppress competition by excluding new schools or less costly methods of training. An independent accreditor is necessary because the same rule can serve either purpose.
Consider distance education in law. Until 2018, the ABA limited how many hours a law student could earn online to 15 of the 83 necessary to earn a law degree. The council then increased that limit to one-third and, after the pandemic demonstrated the viability of remote learning, increased that limit to half. Those earlier restrictions may have been justified on the grounds that they promote higher quality education, but law students deserved to have that decision made by an institution structurally independent of the profession benefiting from the entry limits those restrictions created.
Federal regulations already require accreditors to be separate and independent from affiliated trade or membership organizations. However, a grandfather provision exempts accreditors continuously recognized since Oct. 1, 1991, while another provision permits shared personnel, facilities and equipment. As it happens, most established professional accreditors predate the cutoff. For them, formal independence has largely been optional.
The Department of Education has proposed eliminating both exceptions. The proposed changes would also bar association staff from serving on accreditor decision-making bodies, require independently determined budgets, and mandate disclosure of organizational affiliations.
Those are important reforms, but they do not go far enough. Every accreditor should be required to separately incorporate and file its own tax return. At least 60 percent of an accreditor governing board should be independent of the affiliated association, so that one vacancy or recusal cannot transfer control. And no professional association should provide more than 15 percent of an accreditor's revenue - a benchmark adapted from international auditor-independence rules.
Critics will argue that accreditation requires professional expertise. I agree. Experts can play an important advisory role without creating a conflict of interest. The separately incorporated nursing, public-health and naturopathic-medicine accreditors in our study show that independence and expertise can coexist.
The central question the members of the panel must ask themselves later this month is simple: "Can an accreditor be meaningfully independent when it has no legal existence apart from the professional association it regulates?" The answer is obvious: No.
Tyler Durden Thu, 09/24/2026 - 18:25Iranian president claims out-of-sight Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is ‘completely’ healthy — last saw him a month ago
Colossal hurricane smashes Pacific coastline as apocalyptic videos emerge
Luigi Mangione’s NYC press pass-flaunting fangirl works as aide in NJ councilman’s office
Aaron Judge can’t make a heroic Yankees mistake
‘American Idol’ alum Caleb Flynn’s cringey love songs for mistress played at his murder trial — as victim’s relatives hold back laughter
Trip or treat? You can do both in these ghoulish getaways
Uzbek man nabbed for leading wannabe ISIS crew from NYC home — after spending decade on the run
I test viral workout gear for a living— why I tell everyone to buy this $89 vibration plate
Unions trash Dem Rep. Josh Riley’s proposed legislation to lower utility bills
Up to 20 people estimated to have taken part in NY’s assisted suicide law — in just one month since program took effect
Mamdani Campaign Alum Living In China Talks US Revolution: "Very Surprised If There's No Violence Going Forward"
Explicit calls to overthrow capitalism only suggest revolutionary goals within the reformist socialist movement. There have been reports that some of these reformist socialists have coordinated with foreign subversion networks in Cuba and China or used NGOs to conduct hybrid information warfare.
President Trump has clearly been briefed.
.@POTUS: The Cuban regime has also spent decades coordinating with left-wing radicals and Communist networks here in the United States. As our State Department has detailed, they have cultivated ties to subversive and radical groups such as the Communist Party USA, Antifa, and… pic.twitter.com/Bopz3W6sXz
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 22, 2026The latest comments about revolution and the hope for violence in America come from far-left influencer Hasan Piker's China-based producer, Eric Hovagim, who also worked on socialist Zohran Mamdani's campaign and said on a recent podcast that he would be "very surprised if there is no violence going forward in the United States."
Hovagim said, "I mean, it is simply the situation that they have put the working masses in. And I mean, we're seeing what's happening in the Global South, where you have October 7th happening. You know, this is something that happens when you put people in a pressure cooker, a concentration camp, when you do not allow them the basic human rights that we love to champion in the West."
"The workers of the United States are in the exact same predicament as the workers of the Global South. And it is frankly in their long-term interest to partner with them, to ensure that they can see eye to eye, to build an internationalist movement that goes beyond the four walls of the capitalist states of the United States of America. Because frankly, otherwise they are doomed," he continued.
He noted, "There is no militant group that has had any success whatsoever, maybe since the Black Panthers. But again, we saw what happened when the Black Panthers did have any success. So I don't know what's going to happen."
🚨 Hasan’s China Guy Says He’d Be “Very Surprised” If Violence Doesn’t Hit America
A viral clip of Hasan Piker calling for “Chinese-style communism” and “Cultural Revolution shit” is making the rounds. People should also know about Eric Hovagim, who works with Hasan and… pic.twitter.com/ywf01jc9D8
In a separate podcast, Hovagim discussed his close friendship with China-based Marxist billionaire Roy Singham, whose network of revolutionary NGOs has been accused of promoting pro-Beijing and communist propaganda through what some describe as a possible foreign subversion network.
Taken together, these comments from Hovagim point to the broader far-left agenda, suggesting that the Democratic Socialists of America are not truly focused on affordability, Palestine, climate change, opposition to data centers, or whatever the hottest issue of the day may be.
Instead, they appear more focused on dismantling the foundations of America's capitalist system.
In fact, DSA leaders state their intentions very bluntly:
On another stream earlier this year, Hovagim told his followers: "I'm friends with Roy Singham. He's dope."
Roy Singham and a network of far-left NGOs are under intense scrutiny by the federal government ...
Interesting https://t.co/HHh8RcM3gI
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 29, 2026According to investigative reports (e.g., New York Times, 2023), Singham has worked closely with pro-CCP propaganda networks targeting the US.
Where self-described socialist reformers advocate dismantling capitalism and existing US institutions, their stated objectives point toward a violent revolution.
Any shift toward socialist unrest would raise a separate national security concern: who stands to benefit from social unrest?
Well, it's a shared interest of foreign adversaries as two wars rage in Eurasia, resource nationalism explodes, and the world is on a dangerous path. The good news is that Scott Bessent's NGO team may have disrupted any mobilization of riots this summer, since there were none. But that only suggests more chaos is just around the corner as these revolutionaries regroup.
* * *
Tyler Durden Thu, 09/24/2026 - 18:00