Aggregator

Harvey Weinstein (Finally) Sentenced To 15 Years In Prison

Authored by Savannah Hulsey Pointer via The Epoch Times,

Disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for a 2006 sex crime.

The Sept. 23 sentencing was for the sexual assault of then-TV production assistant Miriam Haley, and comes after Weinstein's 2020 conviction was overturned.

A jury found Weinstein guilty at last year's retrial.

In 2024, Weinstein's conviction for this same crime, which was handed down in 2020, was erased due to a judge's determination that the jury had heard testimony that should not have been admitted.

The judge ruled that the now-convicted assailant was denied a fair trial due to the admission of testimony from women whose allegations weren't a part of the Haley case.

The 74-year-old faced up to 25 years in prison for the assault of Haley, and he has already served six years.

Haley testified about the 2006 assault, which took place at Weinstein's Manhattan apartment, three times: at two trials and again in court just before the sentencing.

The former Hollywood insider has been embroiled in legal troubles for almost 10 years, starting in 2017, and has been a centerpiece in the cultural #MeToo movement that prompted victims to speak out about sexual assault.

Once a powerful figure in the entertainment industry and a major political donor, Weinstein took part in the production of award-winning movies such as "Shakespeare in Love," "Pulp Fiction," and "Chocolat."

Weinstein has been accused by more than 100 women of sexual assault, misconduct, and harassment. He has denied the charges.

Among his accusers are Hollywood actresses and others in the film industry.

The producer and one-time influential political donor was found guilty of sexual assault while simultaneously being acquitted of a rape charge from 2013.

Weinstein, who cofounded the Miramax studio, was initially convicted of rape and sexual assault in 2020 and sentenced to 23 years in prison.

Two years later, he was also convicted of raping and sexually assaulting an Italian actress in 2013, for which he was sentenced to 16 years.

The second sentencing, which took place in California, required that he serve that term separately from the New York sentence.

While in jail, Weinstein was treated for a type of slow-growing blood cancer - chronic myeloid leukemia - as well as heart issues, diabetes, and other issues.

Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 20:55

No prideful team, least of all a John Harbaugh team, will wave the white flag with 15 games remaining.

Yankees manager Aaron Boone is sticking with third baseman Ryan McMahon for the playoffs despite his defensive decline and low .614 OPS.

Glenn and the Jets now have a chance to bounce back in Detroit. 

The biggest development on UCLA’s availability reports continues to be the player who’s absent. Nico Iamaleava. The quarterback who took hits to his hand, shoulder and legs last week was once again not listed on the availability report released Wednesday, meaning he’s good to go for the Bruins’ game against Maryland on Saturday at SECU...

The last time an American president greeted a world leader at JBA was in 1962 when John F. Kennedy met British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan.

The Rams walked out of SoFi Stadium on Monday night with a win, despite their superstar wide receiver Puka Nacua watching from the sidelines.  Without Nacua, quarterback Matthew Stafford looked for veteran receiver Davante Adams and even got sophomore tight end Terrance Ferguson involved in the offense. Now, the question is whether the Rams will...

How the government was begging to be scammed by Minnesota nonprofit Feeding Our Future, pushing quack “gender medicine,” phony demand for library “expertise” and other commentary.

Malik Hassan Allen, 20, was arrested and hit with rape, assault and sex abuse charges in connection with horrifying allegations brought forward by the girls.

Two Northern California cities were named as some of the best markets for home sellers in the United States.

The Texas state senator told Republican women 'we have more control' when the Senate seat stays 'in the family'.

Zelensky To UN: Russia's Deficit 'Bigger Than Any Other Year' - More Sanctions Needed

Among the more interesting parts of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's speech before the UN General Assembly on Wednesday afternoon was when he lashed out at North Korea.

Zelensky said while issuing leveling a litany of charges against Russia for its war that "The leader of North Korea sent his troops to Russia to support the weak points of the Russian army."

via Associated Press

He questioned why a faraway southeast Asian country would be so willing to sacrifice its troops for a Russian endeavor. 

Zelensky said: "You probably saw the broadcast from Pyongyang when they honored those who were killed. And this is madness, too. Why should Koreans give their lives in a war against Ukraine?"

He further accused Kim Jong Un of using his own citizens "like currency" in return for "improved ballistic missiles and Pyongyang’s much [upgraded] drone capabilities." Likely these barbs will only cause Kim's regime to double down, and keep up its military support to Moscow.

By some estimates, hundreds or possibly even thousands of DPRK troops have died so far in the Ukraine conflict. Pyongyang and Moscow have increasingly openly acknowledged the deaths, with North Korea even having held patriotic state funerals for slain troops.

Elsewhere in the address, Zelensky sought to portray his country as essentially 'winning' the war, claiming immense but unverifiable Russian losses on the battlefield, also while Ukraine's long-range drones unleash destruction on Russian energy infrastructure. 

Zelensky:

Just this year, from January through August, the Russian army lost 248,964 people on the battlefield in Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/luHxIwp2Au

— Clash Report (@clashreport) September 23, 2026

Concerning the energy war, Zelensky went on to assert that "Oil itself is not Ukraine’s target, not our target, not gasoline or diesel, not factories or ports … Our target is Russia’s ability to finance this war, to drag it out, to make it more brutal and more destructive."

"Russia's finances and Russia's production are what must be stopped if Putin is to be stopped," Zelensky added. On this front, he presented Ukraine's risky long-range strikes as victorious. But he has also this week expressed willingness to agree to a joint energy ceasefire.

On sanctions, he pointed to Russia's budget deficit as now being "bigger than in any other year" - claiming that "Russia planned major operations on the front this summer; all of them failed."

Zelenskyy at the UN: "Ukrainians understand that this winter could be very harsh for us, but in response we will have no choice but to make it harsh for Russia too" pic.twitter.com/xAOZvFgRro

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 23, 2026

Zelensky also used the speech to try and rally Western countries to not grow weak on punishing Russia and keeping its global isolation in place.

“Something always seems to stop Putin from saying, ‘That’s it. Enough, Peace,’” Zelensky said. “Can you even imagine him without war? He is ‘Patient Zero’, the one from whom war keeps spreading further. ... ‘Patient Zero’ must be stopped.”

He said Russian assets must "remain a target," arguing that "when someone in the world weakens sanctions, weakens sanctions against Russian oligarchs, it may make life more comfortable for rich Russians, but it also gives Putin more time, to send his people into the kill zones."

Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 20:30

CEO Dave Deno said his priorities are centered on food, the guest experience and employees as Cracker Barrel works to build on improving traffic and profitability.

In an offseason when the Los Angeles Lakers had a near overhaul of their roster and were praised for giving out new contracts in every direction, former guard Marcus Smart felt differently.

Swisher announced Tuesday on her “Pivot” podcast that she has asked her agent to get her out of her CNN contract, which officially halts at the end of 2026.

Swisher announced Tuesday on her “Pivot” podcast that she has asked her agent to get her out of her CNN contract, which officially halts at the end of 2026.

Speed was a central challenge in the competition.

Before the Raiders could surprise the NFL with a 2-0 start, they had to settle on a vision, then bring together the people and resources to make it work. That process reaches beyond Klint Kubiak’s hiring, Fernando Mendoza’s arrival or even the partnership between Tom Brady and John Spytek. It starts with Mark Davis. Since...

Sunday will be the 90th NFL start for Jameis Winston. This is not his first rodeo, as they say.

The Sudden AI Panic Has A Lot To Do With The November Midterms

Authored by Victor Davis Hanson via The Daily Signal,

We're about 40 days, close to 40 days, out of the midterm, and all of a sudden there's been a melodramatic announcement that artificial intelligence could destroy the human race. I think everybody's always accepted that remote possibility, and it's been very popular in popular culture, such as "The Terminator" series. But why did all of a sudden we hear about it now?

And the answer is Jason Coxon, a minor figure that had worked in major AI companies, suddenly quit, and he announced that even the CEOs of those companies were worried that they were creating things that they couldn't control, and that artificial intelligence would, on its own, be able to outthink humans and perhaps control the world, etc.

In "The End of Everything," a book I mentioned, a theoretical experiment by the Pentagon, a computer simulation in which a missile was programmed to do anything that it could to protect itself to complete the mission. And when one of the programmers pushed the kill button, the missile turned on the computer screen. It wasn't a real missile, but the simulated missile turned and went back at the person who pushed the button.

So, we've always known that that risk was there, but why was it so exaggerated right now? These CEOs, it was very interesting. If they're so worried about the direction of research, why don't they do two things? Why don't they patrol, control, audit their own people?

It's almost like saying, "I'm afraid that I'll commit arson." And if you're afraid you'll commit arson, then why don't you take fuel away from that person or don't ever touch gasoline? If you're afraid that your company will make something that will destroy mankind, then don't do it.

But if you say, "I still can't control it," then why are you opposing liability, legislation that says the makers of AI, should that AI product be used and be used to hurt people, they're not liable? You would say, "What? Just make us liable. That'll ensure that you can trust us because we might not trust ourselves."

The other thing is they've called, and the Left has called, for international control. I'd like to say, if you look at the history of international control regulations, it's not good.

The League of Nations, did that stop World War II? When Mussolini decided to go into East Africa, did they stop him from using the Suez Canal? Did they tell Japan, "You can't go into Manchuria," or to get out of China? Did they say to Hitler, "Don't go into the Sudetenland"? They did. Did it do any good? No.

The Kellogg-Briand Pact, remember that? That was going to be a worldwide, by Sen. [Frank] Kellogg in the United States in the 1920s, a worldwide effort to outlaw war. How did that work out? Within a decade and a half, we were at war.

How about the Washington Naval Treaty? That was a very inspired, idealistic idea after World War I: Let's stop the dreadnought race. Everybody will agree to make no destroyer, cruiser, battleship over a certain tonnage. Did Japan or Germany abide by the 35,000-ton limit on battleships? No. Did we? Yes. Did Britain? Yes. Did France? Yes. Did Mussolini? No. Did, as I said, Germany? No. Did Japan?

In other words, consensual societies do abide by international treaties. Nonconsensual societies do not.

How about the Versailles Treaty? Did that prevent another war? No. How about the Munich Agreement between Prime Minister [Neville] Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler? Did he abide by that when he said: This is my last territorial conquest in Europe? No. He invaded Europe about a year later.

How about the recent Paris climate accord? Has that reduced Chinese carbon emissions? No. They're building two to three coal plants per month.

How about the United Nations Human Rights Council? Has that stopped the slaughter of Christians in Africa? Did that stop the ethnic cleansing and killing of Armenians in Azerbaijan? No.

So, international accords won't work.

So, what is going on with all this melodrama? Why now? Why on the eve of an election? It's not new. Let's look at some of the end-of-days scares that we've had in the past.

When I was younger, in 1968, there was the Nixon-Humphrey campaign, and all of a sudden Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford professor, said we're all going to be destroyed by overpopulation. He took the old Thomas Malthus worry in the 19th century of overpopulation. He wrote a bestseller called "The Population Bomb," and it said there's no way we can get enough fuel, food, precious metals ... to feed this growing billion-dollar, billion-person population bomb. We're doomed.

And it had a lot of bad effects. People started just to have one child. In Europe, they took it very seriously. The idea was have one child, adopt one. And now Canada has a 1.25 fertility rate. Europe is about 1.33, the EU.

It had disastrous consequences, and we now - we have more people on the planet than ever, and the per capita income of the world population is higher than when Paul Ehrlich wrote that book.

In 1983, there was a nuclear winter. We were all scared. Carl Sagan, he was sort of like Paul Ehrlich, a professor. He was a cult figure. He said that we're gonna have a nuclear exchange, and when we do, the nuclear dust will blot out the sun, and we'll all die.

That was in relationship to the Soviets. For a long time, they had short-range missiles threatening Europe. Ronald Reagan said that's not allowable, to bully Europe. We're gonna put Pershing II missiles to counteract your missiles.

There were some standoffs, and all of a sudden - and what was gonna happen within a year? There was going to be the 1984 reelection effort of Reagan. So, all of a sudden, the Left said: Nuclear winter, nuclear winter, we're all gonna be doomed.

Hollywood made a movie, "The Day After," showing mushrooms dotting the Kansas landscape. A hundred thousand people. It was just a complete hysteria.

Then we had climate change, or rather global warming went to climate change.

In 1992, who wrote "Earth in the Balance"? Candidate Al Gore during that election cycle. What was his thesis? Well, there was global warming we were worried about, but he was saying that heat is a pollutant. Everybody's dangerous or deadly as industrial waste or ozone or whatever.

And he said we have only a decade or a decade and a half, and the polar bears are going to die. The coral reefs off Australia are going to erode. Icebergs are going to melt in the Antarctic, and the Arctic Ocean is going to be too warm, and we're going to have difficulty navigating these icebergs. The endless - you couldn't get a place on the ocean. Barack Obama's house in Hawaii, built, I guess, apparently, will be inundated.

And then it didn't happen. Didn't happen.

But Al Gore and [Bill] Clinton were elected.

In 2016, remember "Me Too"? Harvey Weinstein was using the old casting couch of Hollywood producers to coerce sex from actresses so they could get a role. It started out legitimately, as did climate change worries, as did nuclear bomb worries, as did AI worries.

But that didn't last long. All of a sudden, careers as varied as Garrison Keillor, Brett Kavanaugh, Al Franken, the senator, everybody, if they did anything in their past, stole a kiss, patted someone too long, hugged somebody, half the country was worried over the last 30 years had they said an off-color joke. There was a climate of paranoia.

And it was right during the what? The 2016 election.

And who promulgated it? We'll get to that in a minute.

And then it died. Why did it die pretty soon? Because Joe Biden in 2019-20 was a candidate, and he was going to be the only viable candidate for the Left. They were terrified of Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg is too far left. And Joe Biden was handsy, a euphemism for touching women, hugging them too long. One of them, Tara Reade, came forward and said she'd been sexually assaulted.

And of course, Bill Clinton then earned renewed scrutiny. What did you actually do, Bill? And after you left office, we hear about the [Jeffrey] Epstein connection, we hear about women on your plane, and all of a sudden it disappeared, Me Too.

Then I could go on with the COVID lockdown and the paranoia that ended up probably killing more people, destroying millions of lives economically, ruining education.

I could go into the George Floyd paranoia after the death of George Floyd. Thirty-five killed, $2 billion in property damage, 1,500 police officers, five months of looting, arson, destruction.

What do all these things have in common? Well, they're melodramas. They're psychodramas. All of a sudden, people take a legitimate issue and they start to use it to achieve a political aim.

It's no accident that the AI hysteria is happening right before the election.

And usually, in all of these cases - the Carl Sagan nuclear winter, the Al Gore climate change, the Paul Ehrlich population drama, the BLM ginned-up rioting after George Floyd, the opponents of Donald Trump who wanted to lock down the economy - they're usually used by the Left.

And finally, let's be frank. When they're all over, Carl Sagan is a household name, and he's very wealthy. Paul Ehrlich is a household name, and he's very wealthy. Al Gore starts out as any politician, supposedly very poor. He's from an affluent family, and he's now a near-billionaire.

And the BLM people who ginned up the George Floyd riots, they all retreated to plush homes, used those monies that were intended to be nonprofit funds for their own personal aggrandizement.

In sum, when you see a sudden epidemic, a melodrama, a hysteria, just be very careful because the odds are it will be in an election year, it'll be ginned up by a so-called left-wing expert, and when it's all over, that left-wing expert will be pretty wealthy.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Wed, 09/23/2026 - 20:05