Aggregator
Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wears Pride Night hat with biblical verse
USMNT met the World Cup moment in dominant win over Paraguay
These Are The Hardest Languages For English Speakers To Learn
For English speakers, learning Spanish or Italian can take less than a year. Reaching the same level of proficiency in Japanese, Korean, Mandarin, or Arabic may require nearly four times as much study.
This wide gap reflects how closely a language resembles English in its vocabulary, grammar, sounds, and writing system.
This visualization, created by Julie R. Peasley via Visual Capitalist, ranks languages by difficulty using categories and study-time estimates from Effective Language Learning and Rosetta Stone, which reference Foreign Service Institute-style benchmarks.
Which Languages Are Easiest to Learn for English Speakers?Languages are generally easier to learn when they share familiar grammar, vocabulary, sounds, or writing systems. Thatโs why many Category I languages, including Spanish, French, Italian, Dutch, and Swedish, are considered relatively approachable.
The data table below shows the difficulty rankings and estimated learning time for 70 different languages:
Language Category Time to learn ๐ฟ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ Afrikaans I 24-30 weeks ๐ฉ๐ฐ Danish I 24-30 weeks ๐ณ๐ฑ๐ง๐ช Dutch I 24-30 weeks ๐ซ๐ท๐ง๐ช๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ French I 24-30 weeks ๐ฎ๐น๐จ๐ญ Italian I 24-30 weeks ๐ณ๐ด Norwegian I 24-30 weeks ๐ต๐น๐ง๐ท Portuguese I 24-30 weeks ๐ท๐ด๐ฒ๐ฉ Romanian I 24-30 weeks ๐ช๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฆ๐ท Spanish I 24-30 weeks ๐ธ๐ช Swedish I 24-30 weeks ๐ฉ๐ช๐ฆ๐น๐จ๐ญ German II 36 weeks ๐ญ๐น Haitian Creole II 36 weeks ๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesian II 36 weeks ๐ฒ๐พ๐ง๐ณ Malay II 36 weeks ๐น๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ช Swahili II 36 weeks ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ฝ๐ฐ Albanian III 44 weeks ๐ช๐น Amharic III 44 weeks ๐ฆ๐ฒ Armenian III 44 weeks ๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijani III 44 weeks ๐ง๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ณ Bengali III 44 weeks ๐ง๐ฌ Bulgarian III 44 weeks ๐ฒ๐ฒ Burmese III 44 weeks ๐จ๐ฟ Czech III 44 weeks ๐ฆ๐ซ Dari III 44 weeks ๐ช๐ช Estonian III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ท Farsi III 44 weeks ๐ซ๐ฎ Finnish III 44 weeks ๐ฌ๐ช Georgian III 44 weeks ๐ฌ๐ท๐จ๐พ Greek III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ฑ Hebrew III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ณ Hindi III 44 weeks ๐ญ๐บ Hungarian III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ธ Icelandic III 44 weeks ๐ฐ๐ฟ Kazakh III 44 weeks ๐ฐ๐ญ Khmer III 44 weeks Kurdish III 44 weeks ๐ฐ๐ฌ Kyrgyz III 44 weeks ๐ฑ๐ฆ Lao III 44 weeks ๐ฑ๐ป Latvian III 44 weeks ๐ฑ๐น Lithuanian III 44 weeks ๐ฒ๐ฐ Macedonian III 44 weeks ๐ฒ๐ณ Mongolian III 44 weeks ๐ณ๐ต Nepali III 44 weeks ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ต๐ฐ Pashto III 44 weeks ๐ต๐ฑ Polish III 44 weeks ๐ท๐บ Russian III 44 weeks ๐ท๐ธ๐ญ๐ท๐ง๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ช Serbo-Croatian III 44 weeks ๐ฑ๐ฐ Sinhala III 44 weeks ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovak III 44 weeks ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenian III 44 weeks ๐ธ๐ด Somali III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ณ Telugu III 44 weeks Tibetan III 44 weeks ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฌ Tamil III 44 weeks ๐น๐ฏ Tajiki III 44 weeks ๐ต๐ญ Tagalog III 44 weeks ๐น๐ญ Thai III 44 weeks ๐น๐ท๐จ๐พ Turkish III 44 weeks ๐น๐ฒ Turkmen III 44 weeks ๐บ๐ฆ Ukrainian III 44 weeks ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ณ Urdu III 44 weeks ๐บ๐ฟ Uzbek III 44 weeks ๐ป๐ณ Vietnamese III 44 weeks ๐ฟ๐ฆ Xhosa III 44 weeks ๐ฟ๐ฆ Zulu III 44 weeks ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ช Arabic IV 88 weeks ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ด Cantonese Chinese IV 88 weeks ๐จ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐ธ๐ฌ Mandarin Chinese IV 88 weeks ๐ฏ๐ต Japanese IV 88 weeks ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฐ๐ต Korean IV 88 weeksOne of the most striking findings is the size of the gap between the easiest and hardest languages. While Spanish or French can often be learned in 24โ30 weeks, mastering Japanese, Korean, Mandarin, or Arabic may require roughly 88 weeks of study.
Many Category I languages use the Latin alphabet and share vocabulary roots with English through Germanic or Romance-language connections.
This may also help explain why European languages often rank highly in language-learning apps and why Duolingoโs most popular languages globally include several widely taught European options.
What Makes a Language Harder to Learn?Category III languages tend to have greater linguistic distance from English. This can include unfamiliar grammar structures, new alphabets, or pronunciation patterns that require more time to master.
For example, languages like Russian, Greek, Hindi, Turkish, and Vietnamese all fall into this category. Some use different scripts, while others introduce grammatical systems that are less intuitive for native English speakers.
The โSuper-Hardโ LanguagesCategory IV languages are considered exceptionally difficult for English speakers. This group includes Arabic, Cantonese, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean.
Many of these languages present multiple learning hurdles simultaneously. Mandarin and Cantonese require mastery of tones, Japanese combines several writing systems, Korean introduces a unique alphabet and grammar structure, and Arabic uses an entirely different script. Together, these differences significantly increase the time needed to reach professional proficiency.
To learn more about language use across the U.S., check out Mapped: Americaโs Most-Spoken Languages After English and Spanish on the Voronoi app.
Tyler Durden Fri, 06/12/2026 - 23:00IShowSpeed causes chaos at USA World Cup match
Taylor Swiftโs ex Joe Alwyn spotted on date night with โLove Storyโ star Sarah Pidgeon: report
Taylor Swiftโs ex Joe Alwyn spotted on date night with โLove Storyโ star Sarah Pidgeon: report
LA Rams star Puka Nacua sips Coca-Cola with Jaxson Dart at Team USA World Cup match after rehab stint
Half Of Israelis Agree Deterrence 'Weakened' Following Wars In Iran, Lebanon: Poll
Israelis are raising doubts about their government and military's ability to provide security after more than three months of renewed war against Iran and Lebanon.
According to a Maariv poll released on Friday, 50 percent of Israelis believe their country's deterrence has declined following the recent escalation with Iran and Lebanon, compared to 28 percent who say it has strengthened, while 22 percent are undecided.
via Le MondeThe US and Israel launched a renewed bombing campaign on Iran on February 28. The Islamic Republic retaliated by firing missiles and drones at Israel and US bases in Persian Gulf states until a ceasefire was reached on April 8, largely halting the fighting amid negotiations.
According to the Maariv poll, 49 percent think the Israeli army's freedom to carry out strikes in Lebanon has decreased after the latest confrontation, versus 30 percent who say it has improved and 21 percent who are unsure.
On 2 March, Hezbollah took advantage of Tel Aviv's vulnerability from the war with Iran by renewing its own missile and drone attacks on Israel. Hezbollah had refrained from retaliating to thousands of Israeli bombings of Lebanese territory that violated the previous ceasefire reached in November 2024.
Israel responded by intensifying its airstrikes and sending ground troops to occupy additional Lebanese territory. At least 30 Israeli soldiers have since been killed and 1,302 injured, primarily by Hezbollah's newly introduced FPV drones.
On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to launch an attack on Iran despite US President Donald Trump's supposed request not to do so.
In an interview with the Financial Times (FT), Trump stated, "I call the shots. I call all the shots. He [Netanyahu] doesn't call the shots."
However, Netanyahu ordered a strike on Iran just hours after Trump's comments. Iran responded by striking targets in Israel.
According to the poll, Israelis are divided in their opinion on Netanyahu's decision to ignore Trump and order the bombing. Around 29 percent said he acted correctly, 36 percent said a stronger strike should have been carried out, and 19 percent preferred to follow the US position.
Meanwhile, 62 percent of poll respondents expressed distrust in Trump, while 21 percent said they trust him regarding Israeli interests in any agreement, and 17 percent said they did not know. A poll published by Israelโs Public Broadcaster (KAN) on 28 April found that a majority of Israelis believe the state has failed to secure victory in any war since October 2023.
According to the survey, 57 percent of respondents said no victory had been achieved, while 28 percent believed success had been reached in at least one arena, and a further 15 percent said they were unsure.
The findings came after more than two years of Israel's reported genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, during which Tel Aviv waged multiple offensive military campaigns against Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran, alongside attacks in Yemen and Syria and a campaign of destruction and displacement in the occupied West Bank.
On Thursday, Trump warned that in the coming hours the US would hit Iran โVERY HARD TONIGHTโ and take โtotal controlโ of Tehran's oil and gas industry before reversing course and claiming that a deal with Iran is expected to be โfinalizedโ soon.
Tyler Durden Fri, 06/12/2026 - 22:35Wild brawl breaks out as hundreds of teens descend on SoCal beach
After San Diego attack, a reckoning on Muslim leadership in America
Shaquille OโNeal tells The Post why Victor Wembanyama isnโt the new face of the NBA โ yet
American Airlines flight struck by lightning over UK, forced to return to London
The 2026 FIFA World Cup kicks off in LA with with glitz and star power with Future and Tyla
Trump expected to attend World Cup final in New Jersey: reportย
"Flying Beer Cooler": Pentagon's Next Kamikaze Drone Ushers In Era Of Cheap Mass-Produced Airpower
Our focus on the rise of the "war unicorn" theme over the last four months, shaped by technological innovation seen in the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, has allowed us, in countless notes, to inform readers very early that 2030s warfare has already arrived. In fact, hyperinnovation in Ukraine, now the world's AI weapons laboratory, is what pulled forward these extremely advanced, low-cost weaponry.
Modern battlefields are now defined by low-cost robotics, whether on the ground, at sea, or in the air, as well as drones, other autonomous systems, and AI-enabled kill chains. Meanwhile, the Department of War's shift toward funding and procuring from defense startups, rather than solely from big defense primes, thanks to DOGE, has accelerated the U.S.'s ability to spur a boom in the defense universe as President Trump's broader war economy ramps up, mainly for stockpiling reasons.
Let's not forget our view in late January, when nearly all of Wall Street was misguided on alleged water and climate threats from data centers, completely missed that with hundreds of billions of dollars in data center buildouts by hyperscalers, now around $800 billion this fiscal year, these facilities had, and still have, a missing layer of air defense against FPVs and fiber-optic one-way attack drones.
We warned at the time:
Then noted:
In fact, it only took two Iranian attacks targeting Gulf-area data centers with Shahed drones to become a major wake-up call to Wall Street and private equity about the urgency of understanding this threat and how to capitalize.
More importantly, it triggered the urgent need for private equity to begin raising capital for war unicorns that will eventually become major suppliers of interceptors, counter-UAS products, and much more, because much of America's critical infrastructure, data centers, and the list goes on and on, remains entirely exposed to FPVs.
We understand that multiple private equity funds, each with billions of dollars in AUM, have sent personnel to Ukraine to assess the investment landscape across FPV drone, counter-drone, passive acoustic threat detection, and battlefield AI companies. That alone underscores how quickly the "war unicorn" theme is being adopted on Wall Street, one set to surge in the coming quarters.
Going mainstream on Wall Street:
-
JPM Call With Axon Reveals Race To Fortify U.S. Data Centers Against Kamikaze Drone Swarms
-
Goldman Sits Down With Anduril As 'War Unicorns' Reshape Defense Tech
This leaves us with the innovation question: the "evolve or die" moment now confronting America's military-industrial complex. The focus must shift away from high-cost weapon systems built around titanium, carbon fiber, and decade-long procurement cycles, and back toward what made the U.S. an industrial powerhouse during World War II: the ability to mass-produce low-cost weapons at scale, rapidly, repeatedly, and in volumes that overwhelm foreign adversaries.
Answering the innovation question above, deep inside America's drone industry is California-based DZYNE Technologies, a company building one-way attack drones from the same material used in beer coolers.
The wings are formed by steam chest molding. That's the process behind beer coolers, bike helmets, and the packaging your TV arrived in. Hot steam, expanded foam, a mold, done. No autoclaves. No exotic supply chain. No aerospace machinists charging aerospace rates.
"We joke that it's a flying beer cooler, and honestly, we lean into it," said CEO Matt McCue. "If your airframe costs almost nothing and pours out of a mold by the thousands, you've solved the problem Ukraine has been screaming about for three years."
That problem is mass: cheap, expendable, attritable mass. Every report from the Black Sea to the Red Sea to the Hormuz chokepoint points to the same conclusion: the side that can afford to lose drones wins. Firing a $2 million missile at a $1,000 drone is a losing trade.
DZYNE's Blitz drone fits in the standard-issue rucksack. It assembles in under two minutes. A new operator is mission-ready in a couple of hours. Range runs 80 to 150 kilometers, with swappable payloads for surveillance or jamming, or it can be easily converted into a one-way attack drone.
Notice what Blitz is not. It's not one of those quadcopters filling your X feed from Ukraine. Those are real and they work, and nobody will say otherwise. But they're one layer of a bigger stack. Multi-rotors burn through batteries just to stay airborne, which makes them deadly in a close fight and spend a lot of energy before the fight gets deep.
A fixed wing gets its lift for free, so Blitz extends the same expendable logic out to 150 kilometers, loiters for hours instead of minutes, hauls heavier payloads, and keeps flying in wind that grounds FPVs. Picture the FPVs owning the last mile while waves of cheap fixed wings seek targets, jam radars, and strike staging areas far behind it. That's not a rivalry. That's a kill chain.
Blitzing is a bet that pressure is cheaper than coverage. NFL football fans understand that, and so does every air-defense crew that has watched a million-dollar interceptor chase a cheap Iranian or Russian drone. That brings us to DZYNE's BlitzBox, a nondescript shipping-container system designed to autonomously launch up to 100 Blitz drones into the air for a coordinated swarming raid.
The American company Dzyne has introduced the BlitzBox system, a container for covertly launching a swarm of attack drones. On the outside, it looks like an ordinary cargo box, but inside, it can hold up to 100 Blitz drones, ready to launch in minutes.#DroneWars #UAS #UAV pic.twitter.com/w9aRaZYrCZ
โ Drone Wars (@Drone_Wars_) May 27, 2026"Adversaries have spent twenty years planning around our big, fixed, easy-to-find bases. A hundred drones in a box that could be anywhere changes that math overnight...
... BlitzBox looks like every other container out there on any truck, ship, port, or railyard. That's a feature," said Ryan Holcomb, DZYNE's VP of Expendables.
That is exactly the logic Ukraine demonstrated last year when it launched a drone swarm deep inside Russia from a modified shipping container positioned near an airbase, targeting strategic bombers.
A drone made from cheap beer-cooler material directly answers the Trump administration and Pentagon's call for low-cost, scalable defense war tech. The question now is how many of these drones the Pentagon will stockpile and how quickly these drones can be produced.
Tyler Durden Fri, 06/12/2026 - 22:10