Aggregator
Iran’s injured supreme leader vows to keep nuclear, missile systems intact
One of Brooklyn’s widest townhouses — spanning more than 30 feet — asks a grand $16M
‘Your Friends and Neighbors’ Exclusive Clip: Mel and Sam Finally Come Face-To-Face For a Conversation About Coop Being Framed For Murder
Global fuel shortage could hike up the cost of your vacation — even after booking
Heartbroken mom kills herself hours after husband allegedly murdered their baby daughter
GDP Shocker: 75% Of US Growth In The First Quarter Was Due To AI
On the surface, today's Q1 GDP print was unremarkable: Real GDP grew 2.0% annualized in the first quarter, somewhat below consensus expectations of 2.3% and reflecting a surprisingly small rebound in government spending after the shutdown drag in Q4. Federal government spending contributed only half as much to real GDP growth in Q1 (+0.6%) as it subtracted in Q4 (-1.2%), implying that the level of real federal government spending in Q1 is 2.2% below its level in 2025Q3. Inventory accumulation also contributed less to Q1 growth than we had anticipated (+0.4pp vs. our expectation of +1.2pp). Net exports subtracted 1.3% from GDP after boosting it dramatically in early 2025 as imports surpassed exports. Consumer spending rose 1.6%, somewhat above consensus expectations, but as we noted earlier, much of this has been due to "stimulus" refunds which are now over, and which pushed spending growth far higher than income growth.
Even with the stimmies, personal savings dropped to a 3 year low.
Yet when we get to fixed investment, something remarkable emerges: Housing investment declined 8%, and subtracted 0.31% from the bottom line GDP print, which is to be expected with mortgage rates remaining very high, maintaining a depressed housing market.
But Nonresidential fixed investment was the outlier, soaring by 10.4%, largely reflecting a boost from higher electronics imports and a 12% annualized decline in software prices.
Let's take a closer look at the breakdown.
The chart below shows quarterly annualized GDP growth broken down by components. It shows that Q1 GDP grew at exactly 2.0% in Q1. Also notable is that traditionally strong consumption, which contributed 1.0% of GDP growth, was offset by net trade (1.3%) with, inventories (0.4%) and government (0.73%) providing a modest offset.
The highlighted block is Fixed Investment, which contributed 1.1%. However, keep in mind that residential fixed investment subtracted 0.31% from the total number, which means that Nonresidential fixed investment was responsible for 1.38% of the 2.0% GDP print.
Focusing on the fixed investment component, we find the following: as noted above, it was all about non-residential fixed investment.
Zooming into this segment, we find that Nonresidential equipment grew by 6.3%, or contributing 0.9% to the 2.0% GDP, while Intellectual Property products grew just over 5%, and added 0.7% to the bottom line GDP.
While IP is clear - it consists primarily of Software, the kind that one uses to create and develop AI tools, as well as R&D - the components behind Nonresidential equipment need a closer look again, and here we find that Information Processing equipment, i.e., data centers, grew at a stunning 13%, comprising virtually all of the 0.88% contribution to 2% GDP growth.
And there you have it: between Software (0.7% of the GDP growth) and Nonresidential Equipment (0.88%), AI - which was the primary driver behind growth in both - contributed just over 1.5% to GDP growth of 2.0%; in other words about 75% of all US growth in Q1 was due to AI.
Another way to visualize the remarkable impact of spending on "computers" is the chart below: it clearly shows just how reliant the US has become on spending on computer products.
And that's why AI is now not only a market bubble, but it has become a core anchor propping up the entire US economy; it's also why the US government will have no choice but to backstop it once the inevitable AI bubble pops.
Tyler Durden Thu, 04/30/2026 - 12:53World’s deadliest disease rips across California as clusters discovered at schools
California’s most conservative college revealed in top 25 US rankings — and it’s just outside LA
Fed’s preferred inflation gauge hits 3-year high as gas prices spiked on Iran war
Drake Maye speaks out on Mike Vrabel after Dianna Russini scandal
Trump critics blame president’s rhetoric for WHCA dinner shooting
DeSantis Rolls Out Redistricting Map - Partisan Framing May Put It In Legal Peril
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis rolled out a proposed redistricting map for the state this week, but the way he did it could give ammunition to lawyers mounting inevitable legal challenges that will follow the map's expected approval by the legislature, both Democratic and Republican observers say. Some Republican legislators are uneasy with DeSantis' rollout of the plan -- which he shared with Fox News before he shared it with them.
Today, Republicans hold 20 of Florida's US House seats, compared to 8 held by Democrats. Under the DeSantis plan, the GOP could have a 24-4 advantage. DeSantis gave Fox News a map of his proposed new districts, depicting anticipated party control after the midterms.
The format of that map could prove legally fatal to the scheme. The Florida constitution contains anti-gerrymandering "Fair District" provisions that seek to prevent partisan "intent." A Florida Republican consultant who's participated in previous redistricting efforts expressed surprise at the DeSantis team's use of a color-coded map, telling NBC News, “This is wild. I don’t know how you can argue a red and blue map released from the governor’s office doesn’t show some form of partisan intent.” DeSantis told Fox News that new districts are needed after Florida was "shortchanged" in the 2020 census that determines each state's number of House seats.
In a memo to lawmakers, DeSantis also signaled his new map will be an attempt to force reconsideration of the Fair Districts provisions in the state Constitution. The language requires the consideration of race when drawing new political lines, which DeSantis says is unconstitutional. - NBC
Some Republicans are uneasy about the proposed districts. To create new GOP opportunities, some Republican-rich neighborhoods have been removed from current Republican districts, amping up the pressure on the incumbents who hold them, at a time when President Trump's low approval ratings and significant Republican disenchantment with the administration present significant headwinds for the party. While many Republicans are still enthusiastic about Trump, some are put off by his initiation of a war of choice on Iran, his opposition to the release of the Epstein files, and his disinterest in imposing fiscal discipline.
In what may or may not prove to be an omen for November, a March special election brought Republicans and Trump a bruising loss in Florida, as the GOP lost its grip on a reliably red state House seat that includes President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. The Democrat challenger won the race by just over 2 points -- an approximate 11-point swing toward Democrats from the 2024 outcome in the Palm Beach County district.
An appropriate response to Virginia - but what this reveals is both sides have given up on persuasion, recognizing the country is so divided that it's basically impossible. So it's a race to rig the system in your favor, all while speaking in grand terms about "our democracy." https://t.co/96f8Dsfs4O
— FischerKing (@FischerKing64) April 27, 2026The Florida plan is the latest development in a year-long, nationwide set of electoral-map skirmishes ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In the opening salvo of a war started at the urging of President Trump, last August Texas undertook a rare, mid-decade redistricting effort that aspires to flip five current Democrat-held seats into the Republican column this November. California responded with a new map meant to fully negate the Texas impact, flipping five GOP seats. Other states have made tweaks, and in the latest move, Virginians narrowly approved a referendum that would likely see the GOP lose four seats to the Democrats.
The various plans have been subjected to legal challenges. The last few days brought big news on that front. On Monday, the US Supreme Court issued a summary reversal allowing Texas to proceed with its new congressional map for the November 2026 elections. The justices overturned a federal district court’s earlier injunction against the new boundaries. Sunday held good news for Democrats, as a Virginia court rejected a Republican-led challenge to the state's new map.
As the legal battles continue, some see the redistricting war as a clear signal that America is steadily plowing deeper into discord:
We have reached phase six of Ray Dalio's Big Cycle -- when irreconcilable differences lead to political fracture, war, and then collapse. Arguably, we are already in a soft civil war.
— Kenneth Rapoza (@BRICbreaker) April 27, 2026 Tyler Durden Thu, 04/30/2026 - 12:40