Aggregator
Missouri House Candidate Accused Of Plotting To Plant Cocaine On Primary Rival
A Republican candidate for the Missouri state House is facing a federal charge after authorities accused him of orchestrating a plot to secretly place drugs on a political rival, CBS affiliate KOLR-TV reported.
Thomas Ross, 37, who sought Missouri's House District 161 seat representing the Joplin area, was charged Wednesday in connection with the alleged scheme targeting primary opponent Louise Secker.
Missouri House Candidate Thomas RossInvestigators have accused Ross of directing his former campaign manager to put cocaine and a prescription amphetamine pill among Secker's belongings, according to a probable cause statement. Authorities also believe the Adderall allegedly intended for the plot came from Ross' own prescription, KOLR-TV reported.
Ross edged out Secker in the Aug. 4 Republican primary by 33 votes.
Missouri Republican Party Chairman Peter Kinder has since called for Ross to step aside, describing the matter as "serious and deeply troubling." The Jasper County Republican Central Committee joined Kinder in calling on Ross to withdraw.
Under Missouri law, Ross has until Sept. 8 to remove his name from the November ballot.
Federal authorities have filed a one-count criminal complaint accusing Ross of conspiring to distribute a controlled substance.
Ross has been held without bond in the Joplin City Jail since his arrest Wednesday, with a detention hearing set for Wednesday.
U.S. Attorney R. Matthew Price said in a statement that his office will "continue to uphold fairness, transparency, and integrity in elections and will pursue violations of public trust when warranted."
"Candidates are expected to conduct their campaigns with integrity, honesty, and respect for their opponents, allowing voters to make informed decisions without fear of misinformation or undue influence," Price said.
Ross did not respond to requests for comment, and the federal public defender's office assigned to his case did not say how he intends to plead. Secker also did not respond. The charge is an accusation, and Ross is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
Tyler Durden Fri, 09/04/2026 - 16:40MTA worker, mom of 3, fatally struck by oncoming train while working on NYC subway tracks
Brock Purdy details new family approach with wife Jenna before 49ers season: ‘Crave those things’
Map: New California earthquake data shows regional ‘shaking-intensity’ hazards
Score Jennifer Aniston’s flip-flops, Brittany Mahome’s body oil and more at this under-the-radar sale
Score Jennifer Aniston’s flip-flops, Brittany Mahome’s body oil and more at this under-the-radar sale
Will There Be A ‘Chad Powers’ Season 3 On Hulu?
NYC’s notoriously violent West Indian American Day parade to end early in effort to curb crime
Phaedra Parks confirms she’s dating ‘Traitors’ co-star Chris ‘CT’ Tamburello
Phaedra Parks confirms she’s dating ‘Traitors’ co-star Chris ‘CT’ Tamburello
49ers’ Keion White delivers jaw-dropping quote on being shot this offseason
Insurrection For Real
Authored by James Howard Kunstler via Clusterfuck Nation,
"The Democrat agenda is to legalize crime and criminalize the middle class."
- Stephen Miller
Not to put too fine a point on it: but whenever a lawfare ninja of the Democratic Party utters the phrase "our democracy," you must know that they are completely full of shit. For sure, they do not mean anything remotely related to an American commonweal, as understood by people of sound mind and good faith.
What they mean by "our democracy" is the state as a racketeering operation run for the sole benefit of their party members, along with the ruthless power to annihilate their opponents and critics.
Norm Eisen, Democratic Party Lawfare Ninja Supreme
The war-cry "our democracy" only signifies how degenerate they have become. Though they yearn to win control of Congress in these midterm elections by any means necessary, the party's actual prospects are not so great, having nominated a pack of obvious morons and reprobates such as Abdul el-Sayed (MI), James Talarico (TX), Angie Nixon (FL), Troy Jackson (ME), and Peggy Flanagan (MN) for the US Senate.
Now, it appears that President Donald Trump is determined to clean up our fraud-ridden election process this year, one way or another. Hopes are nearly dead for Congress passing a comprehensive election reform law, the SAVE Act, so he has looked to other measures. One is a procedure for the US Postal Service to match and track mail-in ballots to real persons with actual addresses listed on state voter rolls. The matter is still working through courts. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division has pledged to send about 1000 election monitors to polling places around the country as "observers," which could obviate arrant shenanigans like the broken toilet ploy in Fulton County, GA, 2020.
Mr. Trump could go further, as discussed here recently, and declare a National Security Executive Order with more exacting rules such as requiring proof of citizenship and photo ID at the polls, and reporting election results no later than the day following the election. The Democratic Party is fighting desperately to prevent any changes to current procedure with so much room for fraud.
The effort is led by chief lawfare ninja Norm Eisen, who is associated with several activist NGOs: the States United Democracy Center (founder); State Democracy Defenders PAC; Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW); the Brookings Institution; plus his own pro bono litigation practice, Norma Eisen PLLC.
Eisen enjoys many millions of dollars in backing that have enabled him to file hundreds of court cases against Trump administration actions, including the recent suits against the US Postal Service mail-in ballot plan. His own NGOs are backed by hundreds of other NGOs both here and globally, many of which have been involved in color revolutions in foreign countries. Eisen himself has played a part in many episodes of the long-running color revolution here in the USA, including RussiaGate, the 2020 fake impeachment, and the Jan-6 House Committee. All that could be described in totality as a seditious coup attempt - and it's all currently under investigation by several federal grand juries.
Likewise, lawfare ninja Marc Elias, who operates his election activities through Democracy Docket (founder); the Free election Fund; the Democracy Forward Foundation (board chair); We the Action; plus his own firm, the Elias Law Group. He was formerly a lawyer with the DC law firm Perkins Coie, through which he served as general counsel to the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016. He shepherded the Steele Dossier into the Intel apparatus and around the news media.
All that is a prelude to a disturbing roll-out of events that anyone paying attention can see coming this fall.
The Democratic Party has massive resources not just to stall and obstruct pre-election reform, but to mount a vicious resistance after the fact if it doesn't produce their desired result. They could go as far as to repudiate the election, refuse to accept its results. If the president does issue that NatSec EO prior to the election, blue state officials could refuse to hold elections under new rules. Thirty states have already refused to comply with DOJ demands to submit their official voter rolls for evaluation. Some of the aforementioned activist NGOs have promised post-election street actions (demonstrations that could easily turn into riots).
In the face of that, you can foresee the necessity of the president having to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1878 (10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255). The act provides an exception to the Posse Commitatus Act, also 1878, which forbids the use of the US military to act as police inside the USA. Under the Insurrection Act, the president can federalize states' national guard units to enforce federal law or protect constitutional rights when ordinary civilian means are not enough.
The Act has been used before in our history about thirty times by fifteen presidents, including the Great Railway Strike of 1877 (Pres. Hayes); the Pullman Strike of 1894 (Pres. Cleveland); the Little Rock School Desegregation resistance of 1957 (Pres. Eisenhower sent in the 82nd Airborne). Pres. Lyndon Johnson invoked it three times: the Selma to Montgomery March of 1965; the Detroit riots of 1967; and the riots that followed the Assassination of Martin Luther King, 1968. Pres. George H. W. Bush used it in 1994 to quell the Rodney King Riots in Los Angeles.
If Mr. Trump invokes the Insurrection Act around any violence or organized election rebellion this year, he will invite the Democrats to label him an autocrat, a tyrant, a wannabe king, as they have been taunting him and goading him with for years. Let's suppose that will be enough to inflame the party's activists. I think you can see how this lays the groundwork for something that looks like a new civil war. The repudiation of election results by blue states would be enough.
Know this: it won't work. It will result in charges of sedition and many Democratic officials will be arrested and charged, probably some governors. It will be a really ugly episode in our history, but we'll get through it. Of course, it will be the end of the Democratic Party.
Tyler Durden Fri, 09/04/2026 - 16:20