Aggregator
Inside this year’s Oscar race for Best Animated Feature, as indie upstarts like ‘Wildwood’ take on ‘Toy Story 5’
USC suspends Desman Stephens II for ugly celebration after sending Dante Moore to hospital
New poll shows Marissa Roy leading John McKinney for Los Angeles city attorney role
Yankees tab Cam Schlittler to start Game 1 vs. Red Sox to open MLB playoffs
Shocking video shows Amazon delivery driver peeing all over posh NYC apartment lobby
Comedian roasts ‘red-headed puppet’ Ed Sheeran on ‘SNL UK’ after Macklemore drama
Comedian roasts ‘red-headed puppet’ Ed Sheeran on ‘SNL UK’ after Macklemore drama
Tech CEO Found Guilty In $2 Million Ponzi Scheme
Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,
Michelle Bisnoff, the CEO of wearable tech company Esos Rings Inc., was convicted of running a nearly $2 million Ponzi scheme.
Michelle BisnoffBisnoff tricked investors into believing she owned patents for "smart rings" payment technology that rightfully belonged to her former employer, according to a statement by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Friday. Of the $2 million scammed from investors, the victims lost roughly $1.4 million.
Bisnoff, 59, from Boca Raton, Florida, was hired by United Kingdom-based company McLear Ltd. to develop a market in the United States for its near-field communication wearable payment rings, which embedded credit card information. McLear received a patent for this "smart ring" technology in 2016.
In addition, Bisnoff fraudulently obtained $150,000 in COVID-19 pandemic business relief loans. Instead of using funds for business expenses as initially claimed, Bisnoff used some of the money to pay for personal expenses.
In 2017, Bisnoff formed Esos, and as part of bringing investors into the company, she falsely represented that Esos owned patents for its smart rings, which were actually patents owned by McLear, according to an August 2024 complaint filed in the case.
According to the DOJ, Bisnoff deceived investors, saying that Esos was profitable, had made use of investor money for expanding manufacturing capabilities and inventory for meeting demand from major retailers like Target and Walmart, and received large infusions of capital from tech companies such as Apple and Roc Nation.
"She also falsely claimed to be on the cusp of a licensing arrangement with Middle Earth Enterprises (MEE), which controls The Lord of the Rings brand," the DOJ said.
However, Esos had no agreements with Target; sold only six smart rings on Walmart.com, out of which three were returned; generated little revenue; did not finalize any licensing agreement with MEE; and did not secure investment from Roc Nation or Apple, the department said.
Bisnoff was found by the jury on Thursday to be guilty on various counts of wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, and identity theft. Her sentencing hearing is scheduled for January.
According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), there are several red flags that help identify a Ponzi scheme. One is the promise of high returns with little to no risk. People should be suspicious of any investment opportunity claiming to generate guaranteed returns.
On Sept. 15, the House passed the Tax Relief for Fraud Victims Act. Under current law, the federal government can tax victims of financial fraud on the money that is stolen from them, according to a Sept. 16 post on X by Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio). This bill seeks to rectify this issue, said Miller, who introduced the bill.
Specifically, the bill allows taxpayers to elect to claim a tax deduction for losses that occur due to fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation.
"Victims of financial fraud should not face an additional tax burden after already suffering significant financial losses," Dale Brown, the CEO of the Financial Services Institute, said in a statement on Sept. 16, urging the Senate to take up the bill.
Tyler Durden Sun, 09/27/2026 - 14:00Madonna’s most iconic VMAs looks through the years
Madonna’s most iconic VMAs looks through the years
Kalshi promo code NYPMAX: Trade $25, get up to $2,000 for Vikings vs. Buccaneers
Hollywood star Monet Mazur confronts three masked burglars at Hollywood Hills mansion
Teacher lies about being Palestinian and black: Letters to the Editor — Sept. 28, 2026
Why This Beauty Influencer Tried to Hide Her $17,000 Beverly Hills Nose Job
French bakeries struggle as Iran war spikes oil prices: ‘It’s catastrophic’
Mariners’ top prospect Kade Anderson gets hit by 104 mph comebacker in scary scene
War-wounded military veterans peddling cheap patriotic merch are actually AI fakes out of China: report
The DOE Demands Faster Uranium Enrichment Buildout. Who's Answering The Call?
DOE officials told Reuters they are pressing Centrus Energy, General Matter, and France's Orano to accelerate their new build programs.
The start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022 sent prices soaring across the nuclear fuel chain, as the start of the war was also followed by the US implementing a ban on importing Russian enriched uranium.
The panic of fuel for the US commercial reactor fleet not showing up evaporated almost immediately, as waivers were granted to any and all importers (mostly Centrus and US reactor-owning utilities). But, those waivers are set to expire at the start of 2028, and DOE's Michael Goff says there are no plans to extend them.
To solve the enrichment capacity gap, Washington is doing what they do best: throw as much money as they can at the problem. Earlier this year, money was getting thrown around at almost $1 billion per handful.
“If we are going to have this nuclear renaissance, we are not going to be able to do it without fuel,” Deputy Energy Secretary James Danly said.
The government has started by awarding $900 million apiece for Centrus Energy, General Matter, and Orano.
Centrus Energy traces its roots back to the Manhattan Project, when the US invented uranium enrichment technology to fuel the bombs that were dropped over Japan. With the last domestically owned enrichment facility being shutdown over 10 years ago, Centrus has since served as an enriched uranium broker, supplying reactor-owning utilities in the US and abroad with imports from Europe and Russia.
Orano is the state-backed uranium enrichment company from France. The company has been supplying the massive French fleet for decades and has previously tried to expand in the US but failed for lack of support in the post-Fukushima era. The company is now attempting a second run at a project in Tennessee to assist the US in replacing Russian imports.
Then, there’s General Matter. The secretive, Peter Thiel-backed startup led by former SpaceX engineer Scott Nolan.
The nuclear industry has been mostly devoid of any details on the uranium enrichment startup, with only traces of their business being seen in some of the prep work for a facility in Paducah, Kentucky, and discussions of operations in California, Utah, and Washington State.
Finally, though, it seems Politico found a way to squeeze some details out of the silent company.
Politico’s reporter Francisco Camacho notes a diversified team of outsiders and nuclear veterans, as well as some backstory and the plans ahead. He also brings particular attention on a couple of occasions to the barbed relationship between Centrus Energy and General Matter.
First, when Founders Funds' Scott Nolan was first looking for how to go about entering the enrichment industry. Camacho describes Nolan as looking to initially find an existing company he could invest in. Nolan reportedly concluded the centrifuge design used by Centrus was not commercially competitive.
Second is when Camacho shed some light on the details of discussions between the enrichment companies and the DOE when competing for the $900 million awards earlier this year.
“One person familiar with the DOE contracts said [General Matter] offered 355 metric tons of HALEU annually for the $900 million. With its $900 million, Centrus said it would initially deliver 12 metric tons annually and subsequently scale up.”
Equal taxpayer dollars for almost 30 times the annual capacity ambition is painfully difficult to ignore. The reporting doesn't explicitly state that the goal is 355 MTU annually right off the bat when the company anticipates starting in 2029. But, the difference, as printed, is significant.
Centrus also expects its first new capacity in 2029, while February guidance placed the full 12-ton annual rate after 2030. With the DOE posturing that no further extensions of the ban are going to be affected in 2028, it's understandable why Reuters is reporting the DOE’s desire for companies to start moving faster.
Centrus does deserve credit for being the only facility in the US licensed by the NRC to produce HALEU-level uranium. The company has also been producing the higher-enriched uranium for almost three years, giving them time to improve operations and centrifuge designs.
Centrus has tried to demonstrate some additional concrete offtake agreements with recent supply contracts being signed with advanced reactor development companies Radiant, X-energy, and Antares, with target deliveries by the end of this decade.
Details about General Matter were also revealed in the Politico article, as the company apparently also signed contracts with X-energy and Antares, as well as an unnamed utility.
Based on the numbers provided in Politico, only one of the enrichment companies is actually targeting enough supply capacity to make these deliveries happen in commercial quantities.
We previously highlighted Centrus's $560 million manufacturing expansion for good reason. The company holds preference with the US government over foreign-owned enrichers such as Centrus, Orano, and GLE. But, if Centrus wants to keep its position as the leader of American-owned and operated enrichment capacity, the build times need to drop dramatically and goals need to be raised significantly.
Tyler Durden Sun, 09/27/2026 - 13:25