Aggregator

Sydney Taylor and the 13-win Sky have given the championship-hopeful Liberty more trouble than they should have this season. 

It was a charmed life indeed for Nolan McLean, who watched two other rookies — Carson Benge and A.J. Ewing — combine to nail three runners at the plate in the Mets’ 2-1 victory over the Padres at Citi Field.

Tsai took a big swing at bringing a championship to Brooklyn by signing Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving in free agency in the summer of 2019 and trading for James Harden in January 2021 to form their version of the Big 3. 

What's Behind Trump's Unexpected Favor To Kim Jong Un?

Authored by Andrew Korybko,

He might be flirting with a radical policy recalibration even if he soon changes his mind...

Trump unexpectedly announced that the US will “substantially reduce” its participation in the annual Ulchi Freedom Shield large-scale joint military drills with South Korea that he was apparently unaware of till just recently and which began this week. He described his decision as being “Based on my very good relationship with Kim Jong Un” and aimed at not “send[ing] a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile”. He also complained about its costs and South Korea’s refusal to help the US fight Iran.

Trump’s favor to Kim was unexpected because he mentioned North Korea alongside Russia, China, and Iran as “US adversaries” just last month who have the ability to manipulate US elections. His Under Secretary of War Elbridge Colby was also in Southeast Asia in early August, where he was replicating the NATO 3.0 concept through what can be called AUKUS+. While it’s mainly aimed at containing China, fearmongering about North Korea could raise its appeal among some South Koreans and Japanese.

On that topic, those two states are US mutual defense allies, and they share similar threat perceptions of China and North Korea. They’re also rapidly militarizing, with South Korea planning to build its first nuclear submarine with American assistance and Japan considering abandoning its Three Non-Nuclear Principles, both of which have heightened regional tensions to the US’ divide-and-rule benefit. The same goes for the latest Russian-Japanese tensions over the Southern Kurils in which the US backs Japan.

It was therefore completely unexpected that Trump would do Kim a favor as significant as “substantially reducing” the US’ participation in its annual large-scale joint military drills with South Korea since this goes against all of the abovementioned policies. While only he can account for his reasons, and it’s possible that he simply felt like it and there’s nothing deeper, it can’t be ruled out that he has some plan in mind. His South Korean counterpart’s recent call to resume talks with the North could provide a hint.

Trump might thus be considering the resumption of his own talks with Kim, whether bilaterally like during his first term and/or somehow connected with his “Board of Peace” initiative, the motivation of which could be a blend of personal and geostrategic calculations. As regards the first, he might want to cement his legacy as a “president of peace” like he’s previously described himself as while also distracting from the political-military debacle of the Third Gulf War that he initiated earlier this year.

On the geostrategic front, Trump might fear that Russia, North Korea, and China could strengthen their military-security ties to the point of a de facto alliance in the face of the challenge that AUKUS+ poses to them all, which could risk World War III by miscalculation if North Korea carries out more nuclear and/or missile tests amidst worsening regional tensions. Essentially, the speculative resumption of Trump-Kim talks could therefore be for escalation-control purposes, though only if they’re successful.

It’s admittedly premature to analyze anything beyond what was already mentioned in this piece, and even that which was written is reasonable conjecture, but it’s nevertheless notable that Trump unexpectedly did such a significant favor for Kim in spite of the rising regional tensions that the US is responsible for. After all, this single move goes against all of the US’ policies in Northeast Asia, so it’s not far-fetched that he might be flirting with a radical policy recalibration even if he soon changes his mind.

Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 23:50

Cam Skattebo is looking to add to his game, not subtract from it.

The remains were found in a desert near West Ajo Way and South La Cholla Boulevard, about 15 miles from Nancy Guthrie's Tucson home.

See Vin Diesel, Meadow Walker, Jordana Brewster and the rest of the family here.

See Vin Diesel, Meadow Walker, Jordana Brewster and the rest of the family here.

WSJ Catches Up, Discovers AI's Off-Balance Sheet Liabilities Are $3 Trillion And Growing $1.2 Trillion Per Quarter

More than two months ago, long before most Wall Street analysts had any clue that the bulk of the AI buildout commitments were diligently hidden in various off-balance sheet SPVs and other (perfectly legal) accounting gimmicks, we wrote a lengthy article detailing just that, and explaining why far beyond the $1 trillion (and rapidly rising) in annual plain vanilla capex -- all of which now has to be funded through debt issuance since free cash flow across the hyperscaler universe is negative for the foreseeable future (if not forever) -- which most pundits obsess over daily...

... the real risk was in the "The $1.8 Trillion Off-Balance Sheet Time Bomb At The Heart Of The AI Supercycle."

The $1.8 Trillion Off-Balance Sheet Time Bomb At The Heart Of The AI Supercycle https://t.co/2IAxYrTXjL

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 12, 2026

We followed up on this critical topic after the latest batch of hyperscaler earnings in late July, which revealed that the nearly $2 trillion in spending commitments had exploded in the second quarter, with just GOOGL and META north of $1.5 trillion, which prompted us to conclude that "across all hypers, off BS commitments are now $3+ trillion, double in one quarter."

*MICROSOFT: LEASES THAT HADN'T COMMENCED $329.1B AS OF JUNE 30

we will be updating the off balance sheet obligations/debt for Q2 soon. It will probably rise by $1TN+ to $3TN.

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) July 29, 2026

The SPV bubble is batshit insane

GOOGL is $826BN and now Meta said it has already committed almost $700 billion in future AI spending (BBG).

Across all hypers, off BS commitments are now $3+ trillion, double in one quarter.
GLTA https://t.co/HyV9ZGgFu5

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) July 30, 2026

Many, traditionally those who had no idea what we were talking about or the implications of the above findings, took the conventional route and either mocked or slighted what we had found. 

But not everyone: first it was Nvidia which, scrambling to distance itself from the circular financings that were meant to fund precisely these kinds of gargantuan off balance sheet SPVs, unveiled its $500 billion arrangement with a handful of private credit firms (an arrangement that was nothing new, as Nvidia had already done just that particular deal on numerous occasions, and it merely formalized it in the form of an open-ended MOU).

Second and more important, two months after our first warnings, the WSJ finally caught up, and in an article over the weekend titled "Why Big Tech’s AI Spending Is $3 Trillion Higher Than It Seems", it confirmed everything we have been reporting since early June.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but WSJ authors Rudegeair and Santilli echoed everything we said in our original report more than two months ago, to wit: 

Each quarter, big tech companies disclose their massive capital expenditures on artificial-intelligence infrastructure, from data centers to chips. But those figures don’t come close to expressing the full extent of future spending to which Google parent Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Oracle and many others have committed. That is because a huge swath of their coming financial obligations aren’t reflected on their balance sheets.

Nine top tech companies had some $3 trillion of off-balance-sheet commitments mostly related to AI, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of footnotes in their most recent securities filings. Those obligations are growing faster than traditional “capex,” which totaled about $600 billion over the past year they reported, and were about triple what the companies owe under their outstanding leases and long-term borrowings.

Back in June, we showed this staggering surge in off balance sheet purchase commitment as follows. Needless to say, the latest number is substantially higher.

And this is how the WSJ compared side by side the on (capex) vs off balance sheet obligations at the 6 hyperscalers. Needless to say, the management teams at the big AI spenders are doing everything in their power to cover up just how spectacularly massive their true spending plans are.

The WSJ also takes a look at the off B/S SPVs we have been discussing ever since we explained back in January why Meta's Beignet funding model will be imitated by all of its peers throughout 2026 and onward.

As a reminder, META is already neck deep in off-balance sheet debt. Here is a schematic of its $27.3 billion SPV with Blue Owl "Project Beignet" for the Hyperion data center. None of this touches META's balance sheet.

Expect hundreds of billions of these in 2026 https://t.co/794EgSiiZ9 pic.twitter.com/7hMyVW6Lno

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 29, 2026

Of course, that's precisely what happened and this is how the WSJ lays out the funding of Meta’s gigantic “Hyperion” data-center project in Louisiana, which is the size of about 1,700 football fields, and which "helps explain how big obligations wind up off tech companies’ balance sheets."

Meta initially agreed to lease Hyperion for a four-year term starting in 2029, with options to renew for up to 20 years. It guaranteed that it would make bondholders whole if it doesn’t stay the entire two decades. The company doesn’t think payments under that guarantee are probable, so it hasn’t recorded any liability on its balance sheet.

In accordance with accounting rules, Meta’s Hyperion lease obligations will remain off balance sheet until it starts paying rent. It said its aggregate initial lease commitment is about $12.3 billion. Meta disclosed $347 billion in total obligations for leases that haven’t kicked in yet, including for Hyperion, as of June.

This is the WSJ's version of our graphic from 8 months ago: 

Remember what we said about expecting "hundreds of these in 2026?" Apparently it came as a surprise to the WSJ, which writes that "across the companies the Journal analyzed, promises of payments under these uncommenced leases totaled $1.2 trillion in off-balance–sheet obligations, or about four times more than what was disclosed a year earlier. In addition to Meta, the Journal reviewed commitments for Alphabet, Amazon.com, Microsoft, Oracle, Nvidia, Broadcom, SpaceX and Advanced Micro Devices."

Of course, as we explained two months ago, the uncommenced leases are just a part of the off B/S liabilities. There's much more: 

"Data centers get stuffed with a lot of hardware, including the Nvidia chips that are used to train and run models and memory chips that store information. To buy all that, companies sign long-term contractual agreements well in advance to lock in production from their suppliers."

... which is why Nvidia has the most to lose if funding deals that enable the AI bubble aren't in place, which is precisely why the company rushed and forced the various private credit firms to deliver the $500 billion deal announced last week. Putting a number to it: 

"Those and other purchase obligations at the companies the Journal examined stand at a whopping $1.9 trillion. Under accounting rules, purchase commitments typically remain off balance sheet until a product or service is delivered."

The uncommenced leases and purchase commitments are the bulk of the off balance sheet "ticking time bomb" we discussed in June. Only then it was $1.8 trillion. It has since grown by 50% to $3 trillion.... in two months! And this is how the WSJ redid another one of our June charts:

What happens next depends very much on whether or is an optimist... or not.

For the former, the WSJ says that "there are reasons to believe tech companies will make good on all their obligations. Optimists see the skyrocketing demand for AI tools—which has lifted the stock market and led to shortages of key hardware—as a proof point that demand is going to be strong for years, and the money to pay off all these bills will be rolling in."

As for the others, well the problems are only starting. First, this unprecedented explosion in off balance sheet liabilities in "a worrying sign that some tech companies that once seemed to have fortress balance sheets have needed to tap the capital markets frequently."

Alphabet and Amazon recently posted results showing negative free cash flow, meaning their capital spending exceeded the cash they brought in from operating their businesses."

And that is before considering the implications of trillions in off-balance–sheet commitments. Whether or not the revenues ever arrive, purchase commitments and signed leases can’t be canceled, for the most part. 

The worst case scenarios is that these tech giants companies, which until recently had pristine balance sheets will be paying an expensive tab for infrastructure that they can’t profitably use "if things go wrong." These obligations could also lead increasingly indebted companies to have to borrow even more.

One way such a catastrophic scenario may happen, is if Chinese open-weight models accelerate their market share grab by dramatically undercutting the token prices of frontier models (as they have been doing), and lead to a collapse in hyperscaler profits as compute creation shifts to China and its far cheaper chips, not to mention far more abundant sources of cheap energy... which is precisely what is happening right now, with token prices in historic free fall, crashing more than 50% in just the past few weeks as Chinese open-models unleash a historic race to the bottom.

And since the entire WSJ is effectively re-print of what we said in early June, we will leave readers with our conclusion from then as it is just as accurate today as it was two months ago (and $1.2 trillion less in off balance sheet obligations).

Vendor financing and repurchase-style arrangements mean a single counterparty's stress can propagate through several balance sheets at once. Think of it as rehypothecated leverage. Concentration compounds it: the >$2tn of remaining performance obligations across major AI players is built on a handful of very large, long-duration contracts, so the backlog that justifies the spending is also a concentrated counterparty exposure.

The off-balance-sheet items aren't fraudulent or even unusual accounting — they're mostly standard treatment. The hazard is timing and visibility, and it shows up in three deferred effects:

Capex is being committed ahead of the revenue and free cash flow meant to support it; capex revisions have run well ahead of sales and FCF revisions. The depreciation from all this spending is largely still deferred, rising construction-in-progress balances (ORCL ~+200%, META ~+90% YoY) mean today's margins haven't yet absorbed the expense already locked in. And when it does land, cumulative depreciation for MSFT, ORCL, META, and GOOGL could exceed $520bn over three years, pushing depreciation as a share of revenue sharply higher (ORCL potentially 7%→28%, META 9%→19% by FY28). To hold margins, every other cost line has to fall — which only works if sales rise to match, and so far they haven't kept pace.

Even a careful analyst can't fully size the exposure, because classification and disclosure are inconsistent. Whether a compute-capacity deal even counts as a lease turns on judgment calls (does the contract specify a particular GPU/rack, who controls the workloads, etc.). Disclosure varies accordingly: Nvidia quantified $30bn of cloud-service commitments and Oracle $10bn, while Meta declined to quantify the cloud-capacity portion of its $238bn in commitments. That inconsistency means any cross-company comparison of "true" leverage rests on differing materiality judgments — so the aggregate numbers, large as they are, are themselves uncertain.

The good news is that, for now, the risks aren't an imminent solvency problem, but a set of timing and disclosure mismatches - a deferred depreciation wall, capex running ahead of monetization, leverage migrating into the supplier/private-credit layer, and classification judgments that make true capital intensity hard to compare across companies. For their part, hyperscalers have taken advantage of the current moment of market euphoria to raise as much capital as they can, aware that the window will eventually shut. The question is when sentiment turns, and when all these funding conduits are shut, will there be enough funding to sustain the AI revolution for the foreseeable future. Of course, this question becomes moot if demand shifts, and instead of buying the latest and greatest offering from Anthropic or OpenAI for a stratospheric number of tokens, consumers and enterprises turn to dirt-cheap alternatives from China which offer 90% of the performance of frontier models for a fraction of the cost, then all bets are off.

Much more in our full must-read (as the WSJ clearly found) report from June, as well as the  "AI Ecosystem: Charting Recent Trends"  report available to pro subs.

Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 23:29

As Mike McDaniel is on to new beginnings with the Los Angeles Chargers, he’s about to go on a trip down memory lane. McDaniel stood at the podium on Monday and said this week’s scrimmage and game with the 49ers will be a “Career segment” for him. Los Angeles Chargers offensive coordinator Mike McDaniel spoke...

California homeowners in high wildfire risk zones may soon face strict new regulations in maintaining their homes under a policy that could go into effect as soon as September.

China's YMTC Is Now World's 3rd Biggest Flash-Memory Supplier With 14% Market Share

Earlier today we reported that China's highly touted DRAM memory maker CXMT recently surpassed Tencent to become China's most valuable company.

That may be just the start, because hot on the heels of the biggest Chinese IPO this decade, comes that "other" Chinese memory maker, Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation (YMTC) which has now broken into the world’s top three NAND flash memory suppliers by volume for the first time, marking a milestone for China’s semiconductor ambitions as it strives to narrow the revenue gap with global rivals in high-value data-center storage.

The Wuhan-based chipmaker captured 14% of global NAND bit shipments – a measure of total storage capacity shipped rather than total chip units – in the second quarter, narrowly overtaking Japan’s Kioxia, according to data from Counterpoint Research published on Wednesday.

Samsung Electronics retained the global lead with a 25% market share, while SK Hynix – including its Solidigm subsidiary – was second at 22%.

YMTC’s shipments climbed 22% year on year and 5% quarter on quarter, driven by expanding supplies to domestic electronics manufacturers and the increased production of its latest-generation 3D NAND architecture, Counterpoint said.

Despite its surge in shipment volume, YMTC’s market position lags in dollar terms. The company ranked fifth globally in NAND revenue for the quarter, placing it behind both US-based Micron Technology and Kioxia.

The gap stems from YMTC’s heavy exposure to lower-margin consumer products and a relatively small footprint in enterprise solid-state drives (eSSDs), which command higher pricing.

The product mix imbalance is increasingly squeezing revenue as artificial intelligence reshapes global storage demand.

eSSDs accounted for 48% of total global NAND bit shipments in the second quarter, nearly doubling their 26% share from a year earlier. Counterpoint attributed the surge to a broader shift in AI workloads from model training towards inference, which requires vast amounts of fast storage for frequently accessed data sets.

The research firm projected server eSSDs would account for more than half of all NAND bits shipped by the end of the year.

To capture this higher-margin market, YMTC planned to shift its product mix further towards eSSDs in the second half of the year to cement its third-place global standing, supported by expanding avenues for capital, Counterpoint said.

The strategy comes as YMTC continues to scale its manufacturing operations despite years of US trade restrictions designed to limit its access to advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

Morgan Stanley said in May that YMTC was increasing utilization in its second fabrication plant in Wuhan while advancing construction and tool installation at a third facility. The bank estimated the company would add about 35,000 wafers per month of capacity this year, with substantially larger increases planned for 2027 and 2028.

The expansion aligns with Beijing’s push to localise China’s AI infrastructure, which would drive growing domestic demand for home-grown eSSDs and high-bandwidth memory through installation in data centres, Bernstein Research said in May.

Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 23:00

T’Vondre Sweat didn’t draw any blood or tears.

“I think it’s cynical for the congresswoman to carpetbag into a district and try to take away black representation in a split field,” Elijah Manley said.

Isaiah Williams was repeatedly told what the world thought of his dream.

Fake News, Part I: The Long History

Authored by John Maxwell Hamilton via RealClearPolitics,

In 1896, a daring journalist covering the Cuban revolution against their colonial masters crossed the Spanish lines three times to interview insurgent leaders. William Francis Mannix's final trip into the Cuban interior was made at the request of the leader of the insurgent government, Salvador Cisneros Betancourt. El Presidente Cisneros wanted the intrepid correspondent to carry back an appeal begging for support from the American people.

Mannix's riveting reports appeared on the front page of the New York Times and other leading newspapers. After the Spanish expelled Mannix from Cuba, he was invited to speak to the National Geographic Society and other prestigious gatherings. The Cuban appeal was published in the Congressional Record. "I applaud and approve every word in that splendid appeal," said Alabama Sen. John T. Morgan, who supported U.S. government intervention to help the Cuban rebels.

The nation's leading newspapers decried Spain's subsequent expulsion of Mannix from Cuba. The Washington Star, another newspaper that carried Mannix's dispatches, said he was being banished "for having told the truth about insurgents and their cause."

Mannix scored a journalistic triumph, but it was not one that his editors, legislators, or readers imagined. His three trips over enemy lines and his stories, including the Cisneros appeal, were all fakes. Mannix wrote them while sitting in the bar of the Moscotte Hotel in Havana or - for a change of scenery - on the hotel's veranda.

In an October 2017 interview on Fox News, President Donald Trump said, "I've really started this whole 'fake news' thing." He called it "one of the greatest of all the terms I've come up with." But faking has a long history. No journalist surpassed Mannix as a fabulist in Cuba, but many followed in his footsteps on the island. Their fabricated sensationalizing reached such proportions that a book-length expose was devoted to the subject on the eve of the United States entering war with Spain. It was called Facts and Fakes About Cuba.

This article and two that follow give perspective on three aspects of fake news: its long history, its attraction to readers, and the consequences of political fake news.

The power of modern technology to pollute streams of information has made fake news seem terrifyingly new. Russian bots flood the Internet with horrifying stories that did not happen. Political operatives produce AI-generated videos of despicable speeches their opponents did not deliver. Your crazy cousin spreads word in his social media posts that President Trump's supporters staged the assassination attempts on his life. As to the latter, a NewsGuard/YouGov poll recently found that almost one-third of Americans believe at least one of the three attempts on Trump's life was staged.

Modern technology is a force multiplier for falsehood. But technology is not the root cause. The launching pad is and always has been people: people who for a variety of reasons want to mislead, and people who for a variety of reasons find falsehood more satisfying than fact. Fake news goes back much further than the computer, the television, the radio, the typewriter, or the printing press.

The history of mankind has been a history of the battle between truth and falsehood. The ancient Greeks created gods in their own image by naming them Apate (fraud), Dolos (guile), and Pheme (rumor). The Roman poet Virgil wrote in the Aeneid of the goddess Rumor:

Her frightening mingle of truth and lies,/ Rhapsodically singing about them in the darkness,/ And all the people hear what she is singing.

One place Rumor did her work was on a busy street corner near the Piazza Navona. Beginning in the 16th century, Romans surreptitiously placed false malicious notes about public figures on a statue of Pasquino, who in legend was supposed to be a local tailor and wit. The name of the mendacious notes lives on as pasquinades.

Buttered news

In the years leading up to the French Revolution, historian Robert Darnton documented that France was awash in misinformation. Craque was slang for fake news. The word mimicked the cracking sound of branches around the Tree of Crakow in Paris, where people gathered in the same way the English did at St. Paul's Cathedral. St. Paul's, where pamphlets were sold and gossip exchanged, was called "the mint of all famous lies."

A hinge point in fake news came in the 1620s, when London printer Nathaniel Butter published the first serialized English-language commercial newspaper, "The News of this Present Week." As soon as it and others like it appeared, discerning critics ridiculed the emergence of "buttered news."

Butter's newspaper could not have appeared without moveable type and the printing press, but this technology had been around for some time. What changed was the emergence of a growing middle class who could read and had disposable income to spend on news - even news of dubious provenance.

Butter and those who joined him in the newsbook business were only beginning to understand journalism. They sometimes published the oldest news first, as if to keep things in order. The British crown constrained them by forbidding the publication of domestic news. Forced to go abroad, they relied on second-hand reports, the spicier the better. A typical article read, "A strange apparition at Rome, of two mighty armies," whose battle in the air was followed by a storm of "blood and fire from heaven." According to one historian, "Roughly one-tenth of these early newspapers contained some sort of apparition, vision, or monstrous-birth item," such as boy-girl twins born to a Swiss cow.

Not all falsehood is fake

We need to be clear about definitions. Fake news is intentional falsification. A factual error in a newspaper is not fake news. It is a mistake. A mistake may be due to sloppy newsgathering or an accidental slip. It may call for firing the reporter. But the author did not aim to deceive. It wasn't a hoax.

Politicians find it convenient to overlook these definitional niceties. They discredit factual news that makes them look bad by calling it "fake news." They become the fakers.

The term fake news was routinely splashed across the pages of American newspapers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Each day readers were greeted by headlines like these: "Malicious Fake News." "Fake News Again." "Bit of Fake News." "Concerning Fake News." "More Fake 'News.'" "Fake Stories Afloat." "Fake News. Pope Has Died Twenty-Two Times in Five Years."

The faking habit waned as the 20th century rolled on. First, the cost of starting a new newspaper soared, so it was more difficult for scallywags to wade into the gutter. Second, the intense competition for readers drove the least profitable newspapers out of business. Those that were left found they earned more money by competing on the basis of reliability. Balanced fact-based reports attracted more readers than partisan news. Advertisers preferred to see their products promoted in credible publications.

Of course, some newspapers were outliers. The New York Graphic billed itself as offering "Nothing But the Truth" and then made a merry practice of lying. Long before modern technology made it easy to fake photographs, the Graphic pasted real-life faces on posed bodies. These appeared alongside made-up lonely heart stories.

Many years later fakes still appeared newspapers. In 1980 the Washington Post won a Pulitzer Prize for "Jimmy's World," a story about an 8-year-old heroin addict fabricated by reporter Janet Cooke. A fake in the New York Times the next year was eerily similar to William Mannix's in Cuba. Freelancer Christopher Jones, hired by the Times magazine, invented a detailed story about spending a month with Khmer Rouge guerrillas, who were in hiding in Cambodia. He never left Spain.

But ethical standards had set in by that time. The Graphic went bankrupt in 1932. Its debts amounted to millions. The Post issued a lengthy mea culpa and returned the Pulitzer Prize. When the New York Times realized that Jones might not have been on the up and up, the executive editor assigned three reporters to determine conclusively that the story was a fabrication and then apologized profusely.

We are now back to the buttered days of journalism for the opposite reason we left them behind. The legacy media, as the old established media are called, carry on, albeit in smaller numbers and with generally lower profits. Meanwhile a tidal wave of new, irresponsible media has emerged. The costs of entry are low, and ethics is often considered a nuisance. These news outlets are as eager to fake as Nathaniel Butter and William Mannix were.

Our attraction to fakers like these will be the subject of Part II.

John Maxwell Hamilton, an RCP columnist, is at work on a biography of the journalist-faker William Francis Mannix. His recent book Manipulating the Masses: Woodrow Wilson and the Birth of American Propaganda won the Goldsmith Prize.

Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 22:35

The woman's passenger attempted to grab the wheel and fix the car’s course, but her vehicle still crashed into a 2013 Harley-Davidson carrying a couple, Pennsylvania troopers said.

Arizona reportedly waited until the last possible second to announce the move, as they hoped the All-Star second baseman would arrive in time for the game.

It’s been seven months since George Kittle ruptured his Achilles against the Philadelphia Eagles in the NFC Wild Card, and he’s already making significant progress on returning to the field. NFL Insider Ian Rapoport said he believes Kittle has a strong chance to play in the team’s week 1 matchup against the Los Angeles Rams...

US Navy Destroyer Suffered 4-Day Power Outage In Sweltering South China Sea

Large US naval battleships continue to suffer problems at sea. While there have been many headlines of late detailing the problems of the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier connected to its extended deployment amid the Iran war, a separate warship is having serious problems in Pacific waters, quite apart from the crisis in the Persian Gulf.

"A US Navy guided-missile destroyer spent four days last month without working toilets, galley services and air conditioning in the blistering heat of the South China Sea after the warship lost power," CNN reports.

Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer Benfold. US Navy/AP

The military has since confirmed an engineering failure which caused the significant outage, which basically shut down all the ship's systems, including the ability to maneuver on its own.

A US 7th Fleet statement identified that the USS Benfold, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, was on routine operations in the Indo-Pacific on when an "engineering casualty involving its generators" occurred. 

It happened on July 24, and has now set back additional operations. It was supposed to be part of the USS George Washington strike group which is at the moment headed to the Middle East in order to relieve the Lincoln carrier. 

However, the Benfold is still stuck in Asian waters. "There were no injuries to the crew, who demonstrated resilience, grit, professionalism, and unwavering steadiness in their response," the US Navy statement said.

The four-day crisis impacted the ship's galley services, toilets, air conditioning and potable water, the 7th Fleet also confirmed. The heat would have been sweltering.

No explanations have been given as to how the crew managed the waste problem. USNI, which first reported the crisis, describes of the repair process:

The George Washington Carrier Strike Group supported the destroyer, according to 7th Fleet. USS Robert Smalls (CG-62), the cruiser attached to the George Washington Carrier Strike Group, helped provide meals for the crew, Comer said.

Contractor tugboats towed Benfold to Subic Bay where it was met by personnel from the Ship Repair Facility – Japan Regional Maintenance Center on July 28, with crew receiving contracted lodging off the ship the next day. Power was restored on July 30, Comer said.

All repairs were completed by Aug. 7 when the ship completed a berth shift for fuel. The destroyer left Subic Bay on Aug. 8.

Benfold, which had been sailing with the George Washington Carrier Strike Group, pulled into Yokosuka, Japan, on Thursday, according to ship spotters. It did not transit the Malacca Strait with the other ships of the GW CSG, which are likely heading toward the Middle East.

The timing of this engineering failure incident is very bad for the navy, given already there's much scrutiny being placed on long deployments at sea connected to the Iran conflict.

US Navy destroyer left without working toilets, food service or AC for FOUR DAYS after losing power in sweltering South China Sea

USS Benfold suffered generator failure on July 24, leaving its crew without basic amenities amid blistering heat — 7th Fleet spox confirms to CNN pic.twitter.com/CJBm5r7jv1

— Michael Ashura (@MichaelAshura) August 17, 2026

Congressional leaders are currently focused on the beleaguered USS Abraham Lincoln, amid reports of problems in supplying the ship and mental health problems following a record-deployment.

The Hill reports Monday that "A group of 15 senators said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth owes Americans answers about the ongoing deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group after reports of low morale and a mental health crisis among service members aboard."

Tyler Durden Mon, 08/17/2026 - 22:10