Police "Islamophobia" Training Equates Farage's Words With Hate Crime
Authored by Steve Watson via MODERNITY,
North Yorkshire officers sat through a publicly funded "Islamophobia" talk that treated Reform UK leader Nigel Farage's remarks on British values as if they belonged in the same conversation as a racially aggravated attack.
The trainer then asked the room which man had done "the most harm" - the politician on national television, or a man filmed abusing a Muslim bus driver.
The session was part of Project Unity, delivered by Abbas Najib, a former officer and now chief executive of Better Communities Bradford, at the York and North Yorkshire Hate Crime Conference in 2025.
Police officers were lectured about Nigel Farage in a publicly funded talk about Islamophobia, The Telegraph can reveal.
Officers at a hate crime conference attended training sessions that compared the Reform UK leader's opinions, specifically his doubts about young Muslims'... pic.twitter.com/u2HutKLxs4
Police sources later insisted it was on the conference timetable rather than official force training, and that Najib was not a North Yorkshire employee. That distinction will not comfort anyone watching officers being invited to treat lawful political speech as a hate-crime accelerant.
Attendees were shown a 2024 interview in which Farage warned that "growing numbers of people do not subscribe to British values," naming Muslims and those turning out for the pro-Palestine marches in London. He cited a Henry Jackson Society survey finding that 46 per cent of British Muslims supported Hamas.
The room was then shown footage of a 2024 racial assault on a Muslim bus driver and told to "think about the relationship" between Farage's words and the offence. Officers were instructed to "draw your own conclusions" about the Reform leader and to "think about whether this commentary has any influence on something like this."
Najib put the comparison in the open. "Ask yourself, who is going to get into trouble between those two gentlemen? And who did the most harm?" He added: "Sitting in a national news studio and saying 'Jews hate Britain'. He'd be locked up before he left the studio, and too right too."
The same lecture also went after other Reform figures. Najib objected to "mainstream, high-profile politicians" such as Suella Braverman, Robert Jenrick and Michael Gove calling the pro-Palestine demonstrations "hate marches," and recast those protests as "protesting genocide."
Written material claimed women were not oppressed by the stipulations of Islam. The session defended mass immigration and argued that "Muslims, the immigrant, the brown person" were being scapegoated for a flatlining economy, when the real culprit was "the rich."
Footage of Matthew Goodwin on GB News was used as well. Goodwin had presented a YouGov survey finding that more than half of Britons believed Islam was not compatible with British values. The training material answered that poll with a claim that Islamic teachings sit neatly alongside David Cameron's official list of British values: democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, respect and tolerance.
Goodwin later told GB News he was "shocked and appalled by the context of this talk," and "even more outraged by the fact that it was given to a politically neutral organisation such as the Police." He said the session showed that "there are some people in Britain who will not even allow us to have a debate about the role and compatibility of Islam in modern Britain."
Better Communities Bradford has received £490,000 from the National Lottery Communities Fund since 2019, including a £35,000 grant to roll out Project Unity. The programme covers "media and political narratives" and "myths and misconceptions about Islam." The Telegraph reported that the same material has been presented to students, council staff and civil servants working on Prevent, the state's counter-extremism programme.
Najib defended the work. "Project Unity exists to reduce anti-Muslim hostility and strengthen trust between communities," he said. "Statements made on national platforms reach millions, so the workshop looks closely at the words themselves and how they land." He told GB News that Farage's comments were "a sweeping claim about how British Muslims feel about this country" and that, in his view, "generalisations of that kind about an entire faith community are Islamophobic and fuel anti-Muslim hostility."
Jenrick's response cut through the charity language. "Yorkshire Police officers attended training sessions that compared the views Nigel Farage and I hold towards Islamists to a racially aggravated CRIME," he wrote. "They took issue with my description of the 'hate marches' and the fact research found 46% of British Muslims supported Hamas." He added: "The police have been infiltrated by bad-faith actors seeking to police speech, not actual crime."
Braverman tied it to the record she already put on the table. "This is the root cause of why the police refused to stop the hate marches, why antisemitism and extremism is out of control and why I was forced to blow the whistle on two-tier policing in 2023."
The timing is not accidental. Last week Policy Exchange reported that the National Association of Muslim Police had published papers defending Hamas, calling the IDF a "Zionist terrorist group," branding Zionism a form of anti-Muslim hatred, and treating the word "Islamist" as Islamophobic. NAMP denies defending a proscribed organisation. The paper still existed. The association still sits inside British policing.
The North Yorkshire session fits a pattern we have long documented. Hampshire officers told Braverman that mandatory DEI sessions had "drummed into us about our white privilege and unconscious bias," and that the outsourced trainer "was deeply hateful of white people and our culture."
Those officers stayed quiet because they feared for their careers. That same culture sat in the background of the Henry Nowak case, where an 18-year-old white teenager was handcuffed while bleeding out after his Sikh attacker accused him of racism.
Thames Valley Police has forced officers through "equity training" on white privilege, micro-aggressions and the shift from "non-racist" to "anti-racist," even after a tribunal found the force had positively discriminated against white officers.
Former assistant chief constable Kerrin Wilson recorded that white males "felt disadvantaged" and saw "unfairness was allowed for minority groups but not for majority populations."
Former officer and government adviser Rory Geoghegan put it plainly: officers "deserve far better from their leaders than to be crudely categorised by skin colour and subjected to reductive, divisive ideologies."
West Midlands Police has invited non-Muslim staff to fast during Ramadan as an act of "solidarity." Shadow justice secretary Nick Timothy called that "wholly inappropriate," arguing the police should observe "the same standards regardless of creed."
Major Andrew Fox of the Henry Jackson Society said the police exist "to enforce the law impartially, not to promote or facilitate religious practices."
Meanwhile, retired officer Stephen Gray was fined this year for sharing an online post critical of Islam. The Free Speech Union is backing his appeal and has warned that government Islamophobia definitions, already being used by forces, are functioning as a blasphemy code Parliament abolished in 2008.
A police service that lectures officers on the "harm" done by Farage while failing to hold the line against Islamist intimidation, antisemitic marches and two-tier street enforcement is not protecting the public. It is protecting a narrative.
Lottery money, Prevent briefings and conference slots have been handed to people who treat integration questions as suspect and political speech as a public-order problem. Impartial policing cannot survive that bargain.
Tyler Durden Wed, 09/30/2026 - 15:40